<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>SLM Production Group</title>
      <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:23:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Showcase ONE - Your Gateway to New Artists</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="showcaseone.gif" src="http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/images/showcaseone.gif" width="288" height="173" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>SLM Production has partnered with Smash Studios and NuRizen LLC to create a new spin on independent music TV -&nbsp;<a href="http://www.showcaseone.com">www.showcaseone.com</a>.  Pulling from the visual style of SLM Production, the television production experience of NuRizen and the well known reputation of Smash studios, this partnership will produce a multiformat show &nbsp;(tv, web, mobile) highlighting the forever rising diversity of music talent in the New York City area.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>It's a showcase of indie rock bands, underground rap groups, funk, soul, and breakbeat djays.  Some are from New York, others have come from far away. We'll try to cover them all. Logon and claim your username now.&nbsp;<a href="http://www.showcaseone.com" style="text-decoration: underline; ">www.showcaseone.com</a><div><br /></div></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/06/smash_studios_tv.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/06/smash_studios_tv.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">DP Projects</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Main</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know the difference between Flash and Silverlight and why it matters for content creators ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[With all of the talk about Apply not playing nice with Adobe and therefore pushing Flash even further off its platform it seems we have lost site of what these tools really do and why they are important.<div><br /></div><div>Silverlight is Microsofts "version" of Flash. &nbsp;Flash of course has been around for a much longer time than Silverlight and is a much more mature product. &nbsp;However, Silverlight is based on the .NET programming platform and the Window Presentation Foundation (WPF) layer. &nbsp;This means for a much more robust and extensible programming language and capability than Flash and Activescript can provide. &nbsp;This will allow you to creative the&nbsp;immersive&nbsp;content that will win in a Web 3.0 world.</div><div><br /></div><div>Mark my words now, content will become less and less Video based and more and more interactive and immersive based as time goes by. &nbsp;That means more then just chaptering videos. &nbsp;It means tight integration with social networks such as keying of videos to twitter flows. &nbsp;It means interacting with other around the content on webcams and messaging. &nbsp;And Silverlight looks to be a great platform to creative these incredibly immersive experiences- that is of course if enough people are willing to download the SIlverlight environment into their browsers. &nbsp;And it also depends on how deep of an experience HTML 5.0 will be able to provide - my suspicion is that it will be very good but not as deep as a platform based on a true programming language and environment.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/05/wanna_know_the_difference_betw.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/05/wanna_know_the_difference_betw.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know a great tool for consolidating all your accounts business and personal ...</title>
         <description>Check out Pageonce http://pageonce.com/ - its got great tools for adding all of your online accounts including bank, credit cards, utilities, phones, etc etc.  Very comprehensive list and great way to look at all your balances and numbers in once place.  Also has a great app for the Droid (though Im sure on the iphone too).  Give it a try to see if it simplifies your life.</description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/05/wanna_know_a_great_tool_for_co.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/05/wanna_know_a_great_tool_for_co.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know a good and easy to use Blu-ray disc authoring program ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This is an easy one - <a href="http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/product/taw4.html">TMPGEnc Authoring Works 4</a>&nbsp;is a great tool. &nbsp;It only cost about 100 dollars and allows authoring of all types of dvds and bluray discs. &nbsp;Its easy to add footage, cut edit, change soundtracks - it had a medium selection of premade menus for the discs and allows you to create your own and customize. &nbsp;It will export a disc image, a set of file, or burn to disc. &nbsp;Many many options and easy to use at the same time. &nbsp;In a world where many disc authoring tools create a lot of frustration, this one really stands out as a great buy and addition to your arsenal.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_a_good_and_easy_to.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_a_good_and_easy_to.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know how light of different qualities wraps around the subject ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Light wraps - and that means that it, in a sense, sweeps around a subject and has a certain falloff as you move angularly away from the source.  To be precise, light is all direct and straight lines but the effect of wrapping is due to the incidence (amount) of light at different angles.  So wrapping is effected by the light and the subject.&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>For example if you have a cube with 1 face directly toward a light there would be no wrapping to the other faces (no light hitting) because there is no straight line from the light to those faces.  But with a sphere you would see a fall off around the sphere and the quality of that falloff is dependent on the type of light.</div><div><br /></div><div>A kino (florescent) light, for example is very soft, so you can think of the light as kinda fluffy and therefore wraps softly and lightly around the subject. &nbsp;However, an HMI is a an extremely sharp hard light (actually a single point light) which therefore has a quick falloff and fast wrap falloff on the subject. &nbsp;Tungsten is also quite sharp, though much less then an HMI. &nbsp;You can make a Tungsten or HMI wrap more by adding some diffusion and thereby softening it. &nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>When placing a light, the softer light will wrap more and therefore will have to be moved further off angle to have a good falloff from light to dark on the subject as opposed to a hard light which can be on a more direct angle. &nbsp;Understanding this will help you to get more bang for your buck with light placement and helps to avoid some flagging you might otherwise do to control a poorly placed light.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_how_light_of_differ.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_how_light_of_differ.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know why audio subframe editing is an important feature in an audio editing system ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Very often people try to edit their audio in the NLE of their choice.  They edit the video and then start working on the audio - the problem is that you dont have nearly enough control in SOME NLEs to do this.  And this is because SOME NLEs dont allow subframe audio editing.  What does this mean?&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>&nbsp;If you are editing a project at 24 frames per second and cant go subframe for audio then you can only cut or move audio at frame lines which is every 1/24 of a second. &nbsp;While 1/24 of a second sounds short and small, your ear can hear a whole lot faster then that. &nbsp;Take, for example audio recorded at a 48 KHz sample rate - that is 48,000 samples per second - each lasting 1/48000 of a second. &nbsp;Why so much? Cause we hear very very quickly. &nbsp;So to take out an audio pop, or edit a syllable or sibilance or move a word in sync with picture you almost always need a higher audio resolution then the sample rate of your video (24 Hz).</div><div><br /></div><div>Avid - doesnt allow subframe audio editing so you are forced to export to an audio program, do your work and reimport the results. &nbsp;Adobe CS4 Premier does allow subframe audio editing, down to the sample. &nbsp;FCP allows some subframe editing. &nbsp;ALL audio editing tools allow subframe editing (since they arent really tied to video anyhow).</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_why_audio_subframe.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_why_audio_subframe.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know some great, and affordable encoding tools for all different formats ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I know for all you folks on MAC you use compressor - but I am a PC guy so here are the tools I have in my arsenal.</p><p>Premier CS4 comes with Media Encoder which will allow the encoding of different formats of both &nbsp;audio and video and works well and allows for batch processing . &nbsp;Its perfect when you are working in adobe tools and need to export. &nbsp;However when I need to convert something I use one of 2 tools. &nbsp;<a href="http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/product/te4xp.html">Tmpgenc</a>&nbsp;costs about 100 dollars and allow many different formats in and out and has a ton of options. &nbsp;Encoding ranges from fast to&nbsp;excruciatingly&nbsp;slow depending on the codec you are using. &nbsp;At the price its a heck of a bargain.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also use <a href="http://www.sorensonmedia.com/video-encoding/">Sorenson Squeeze</a>&nbsp;which isnt cheap at about $800 dollars although it comes for free with Avid Media Composer. &nbsp;Its also great and seemingly faster then Tmpgenc (as it should be at 8 times the price) - but if money is an issue Tmpgenc is a great choice and will last you a long long time.</p>
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_some_great_and_affo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_some_great_and_affo.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know a complete workflow for working audio for a video project in Pro tools ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Pro tools is an industry standard audio editing and mixing platform but this process is pretty agnostic and will work with any platform. &nbsp;Specifics might be different though.<div><br /></div><div>First you need to export the audio from your video project to bring into protools. &nbsp;A good format for this is OMF. &nbsp;You do not want to just mixdown the audio into a wav file because you need your tracks to be independent to put different eqs and effects where you need them. &nbsp;Also make sure that you put sufficient handles on your material to allow for crossfades and extending of clips. &nbsp;I like to have 5 second handles but less can work as well. &nbsp;You should also put a pop at the beginning AND the end of your audio so you can check sync and drift later on.</div><div><br /></div><div>To import OMF into protools you need to enable digitranslator, which costs in the range of $500. This will allow a complete one step import and placement of your audio on separate tracks. &nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>Once you complete your work simply mix down into a wav file and reimport into your video NLE. &nbsp;Check that your pops line up and you will be good to go.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_a_complete_workflow.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_a_complete_workflow.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know how Panasonic is changing the 3D filmmaking game with new technology, and somewhat affordably ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Panasonic recently announced its&nbsp;foray&nbsp;into the 3d video camera landscape with the AG3DA1fully-integrated Full HD 3D solid-state camcorder. &nbsp;This camera has dual lenses with complete control over interocular distance and convergence. &nbsp;It allow simultaneous &nbsp;control of the lens functions such as aperture and focus. &nbsp;It records onto dual SD cards. &nbsp;And all of this for a price of about 20,000 which is amazing compared to any other professional solution that exists. &nbsp;All that and it weighs only about 6 pounds so it can go handheld. &nbsp;Just amazing really - all custom built and preorders are being taken right now for fall 2010 delivery.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_how_panasonic_is_ch.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_how_panasonic_is_ch.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know why chip resolution is not all that important in the most recent DSLRs for video production ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Before I answer this one - I am not considering the usefulness of chip resolution for still photos - it does have more of an impact there although very often, even for that the importance is over stated.<div><br /></div><div>However, for video production, the chip resolution race in the DSLRs makes no difference really - or at least not directly. &nbsp;Think about the resolution of a HD frame (1920x1080) - now think about how many pixels a 6 megapixel camera can capture - now how about a 12 Megapixel. &nbsp; It just stops mattering because you cant fill a 1 gallon bucket with more then a gallon of water. &nbsp;Have you ever tried to bring a still image from a high megapixel camera into an HD project in Premier? It complains that it is too large. &nbsp;So the megapixel race isnt important to the video side.</div><div><br /></div><div>Well... thats not entirely true - the MORE megapixels you have the WORSE your aliasing issues will be. &nbsp;This is because the optical low pass filter will be much finer and allow more detail into the camera imager when there are more megapixels. &nbsp;Therefore the techniques used to get video from the chips currently, such as pixel binning, row skipping etc, will have more of a disparity with the actual resolution hitting the imager. &nbsp;Therefore you will alias more.</div><div><br /></div><div>So in fact a higher megapixel HDSLR camera will perform more poorly (everything else equal of course other then the megapixel count). &nbsp; hmmmm - interesting.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_why_chip_resolution.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_why_chip_resolution.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know why Targa images are a perfect edit collaboration format - and what the challenges in using them are ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Targa is usually an uncompressed format and can be of a deep bit depth.  When you export targa images from a video sequence, the NLE will uncompress the video stream and export each individual frame in its entirety as a standalone image.  Each image is not recompressed.  So it becomes very much like film in that you have discreet images for each frame of the video.If you look at the file size of all the Targa images you will see they are exactly the same because they contain the exact info to reproduce each pixel. &nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>One thing to note, is that although the Targa images are uncompressed, you are still limited by the information in the original video file. &nbsp;So the compression artifacts will still be there. &nbsp;BUT, and here is the key, you have not introduced any NEW compression issues by using targa images. &nbsp;So you can hand off the Targa images to someone else, for effects or whatever is needed, without fear of losing quality when exporting from your NLE. &nbsp;They can do their work and in turn export Targa for you and similarly no quality will be lost (except, of course, any quality loss from the work they did on the footage). &nbsp;Its an excellent way to collaborate over footage.</div><div><br /></div><div>Couple caveats, your video files (sets of stills) will be large. &nbsp;So you will need the storage to move them around OR a lot of time to ftp them to the other person. &nbsp;You need to make sure the person receiving the images can pull in a sequence of stills as a video file into their NLE or effects program (most if not all can). &nbsp;You need to make sure the images are numbered sequentially at the end of the file names so that the NLE knows how to order them (most if not all NLEs do this for you automatically when exporting Targa, though you need to make sure the name has the numbers at the end). &nbsp;Finally, and this is very important, make sure to use the exact same frame rate when exporting and importing, otherwise frame blending will occur to match the frame rates OR your footage will play back too fast or too slow in the receiving NLE.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_why_targa_images_ar.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_why_targa_images_ar.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know whats probably the most important difference between the Canon 7D and the T2i for filmmakers ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[There are several differences between the Canon 7D and the Canon T2i - and you should expect there to be simply because there is almost a 1000 dollar price difference and nothing is for free.  But, I believe one difference is key and will make the T2i very difficult to use over the 7D in all but the most controlled environments.<div><br /></div><div>The 7D outputs an HD stream live through its HDMI connection while recording - this allows you to use a larger, high quality monitor to pull focus. &nbsp;Since most times filmmakers are using these HDSLRs to capture shallow depth of field, both for&nbsp;aesthetics&nbsp;and to avoid aliasing, critical focus is very difficult to hit. &nbsp;With a good monitor you can do this.</div><div><br /></div><div>The T2i had an HD stream from its HDMI port UNTIL you hit record. &nbsp;Then it switches to SD. &nbsp;And you cannot use an SD signal to get precise focus. &nbsp;So this camera is good for set it and forget it focus situations, such as an interview (with little movement) or other controlled shots. But nothing where you need to pull focus by using a monitor. &nbsp;Good to know ...</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_whats_probably_the.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_whats_probably_the.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know a great free tool for managing your small business and projects ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[There are many team collaboration tools out there - one well known one is Microsoft Sharepoint - but it costs a bit of money even in a hosted environment.  A great FREE tool is sosius (<a href="http://www.sosius.com">www.sosius.com</a>). &nbsp;It allows you to store and collaborate over documents, chat rooms, discussion boards, custom databases, tasking and a whole lot more. &nbsp;You can have multiple projects each with different team members and granular permissioning. &nbsp;Each user has a dashboard showing information relevant to them. &nbsp;Its excellent and extensible. &nbsp;Free for up to about half a gig of storage. &nbsp;After that its priced depending on your needs. &nbsp;Check it out if you have been meaning to get your team, production crew etc organized.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_a_great_free_tool_f.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_a_great_free_tool_f.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wanna know how to take ordinary greenscreen footage n make amazing broll in an hour ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[First use a great key plugin in whatever editor you are using.  One of the best with many options is Keylight - its available in Premier and probably other editors.  It allows you to select the key color and then use several methods of refining the key including the usual shrink and grow key controls and alpha channel mods. But is also allows you to change the white and black levels and perform basic foreground color correction as create easy garbage mattes. &nbsp;Once you get used to this plugin (and of course shoot good greenscreen footage) the key part becomes very fast.<div><br /></div><div>Once you have keyed it - just place it over a sold. &nbsp;Find a texture to use as a background and screen it onto the background with opacity to taste. &nbsp;Then use a circular ramp to have some color&nbsp;highlight&nbsp;the keyed action. &nbsp;You can also screen a texture over the foreground with a low opacity and then randomly wiggle it to create a nice "noise" effect. &nbsp;Play around with some other options or plugins but try to be subtle - Dont do too much at a time. &nbsp;With just a little work you can have amazing b-roll cutaways for music videos, promos and any creative&nbsp;pieces.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_how_to_take_ordinar.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/wanna_know_how_to_take_ordinar.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>If you are interested in why adobe premier pro is better than avid and fcp for p2 footage ...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I was always an avid guy - but you have to copy p2 footage into media directories so I end up with 2 copies of master footage (i always keep 2 to have a backup) and then the footage on the media drive (which doesnt count as a master cause its not in the original dir structure).  fcp is one step worse - not only do you have to import the footage but it rewraps it to make the files completely different then the originals in terms of format (same quality though of course).&nbsp;<div><br /></div><div>Adobe Premier you just point to a p2 dir or a folder containing many p2 dirs and it finds everything and references it there so you can actually use one of your masters as a working copy - lovely and i didnt realize till i started with premier a few months ago.&nbsp;</div><div><br /></div><div>My guess is that premier actually was the less developed platform at first so just referenced files where they are to be simpler and now its working out for them.</div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/if_you_are_interested_in_why_a.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.slmproduction.com/mainsite/2010/03/if_you_are_interested_in_why_a.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Just ask</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
